Ever since the death of Osama a lot has changed in the security circles. It was however believed that, at his demise the problem of terrorism was going to be dealt with. This however wasn’t the case. Instead, the world has been exposed to extremism (Fromkin, 1989). The trend is however turning from bad to worse as some countries are now known to fund these activities. On the other hand, more sympathizers are joining in the fight only complicating the situation. It’s even harder to distinguish between a genuine citizen and a sympathizer. This is even more challenging owing to such people being in the corridors of power or perhaps serving in the security force only complicating the security situation. It’s largely due to them revealing credible information most of which is likely to complicate the security situation only exposing the society to extremism (Gelvin, 2005).
So should the media not give them a chance to the audience or what should the media do to reduce cases of terrorism? Or what is the role of the media in fighting terrorism? If this were in the past where media freedom was not upheld, the best action would have been to shut all media houses but this is the 21st century where everything including non-living things has rights. Therefore, there is no doubt that each and every citizen has a right to know of any attacks, loss of lives or property destruction.
As per Smith (2012), the earth recognizes a consideration of physical violence becoming alternative our behavior term as doubtful and jaded. Eventhough scholars verify by a good amount of evidences that are inclined to aid these kinds of perspectives. The author goes further by relating to violence as a natural expression that entails free will. When terrorism is linked to violence then, it will be ideologically as compared with locating its principal bring about. Faisal Devji in addition to in the year 2005 brought up problems every time they reinterpreted assault perpetrated by Al Qaeda. The things ones multiple remain unanswered position a daunting representation to everyone. (Coughlin, 2006)